Rt Hon Greg Clark MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Dear Greg,
Congratulations upon your recent re
election as our MP, no doubt in no small part thanks to my Lamberhurst High
Street ‘GREG CLARK POSTER’ in my front garden!
election as our MP, no doubt in no small part thanks to my Lamberhurst High
Street ‘GREG CLARK POSTER’ in my front garden!
I am writing to you today following your
letter dated 28th June 2019 where you stated that the DWP had
contacted you and confirmed that they should not have stopped my DLA last year
(2018) and had paid my arrears. I received £3855.15 which was for 11/07/2018 to
11/06/2019 and has continued since. Thank you for your help although here we
are 6 months later and I am at an impasse with the DWP as my DLA was in fact
stopped on 14/03/2018 therefore as it should not have been stopped, I am still
owed £327.60 X 4 = £1310.14.
letter dated 28th June 2019 where you stated that the DWP had
contacted you and confirmed that they should not have stopped my DLA last year
(2018) and had paid my arrears. I received £3855.15 which was for 11/07/2018 to
11/06/2019 and has continued since. Thank you for your help although here we
are 6 months later and I am at an impasse with the DWP as my DLA was in fact
stopped on 14/03/2018 therefore as it should not have been stopped, I am still
owed £327.60 X 4 = £1310.14.
After countless enquiries on the phone, by
letter and 6 months later the DWP have refused to pay the arrears although I
have read a copy of the letter confirming the DLA should never have been
stopped the DWP have refused to pay it even after several mandatory
reconsideration notices and the latest DWP farce is that they say I have to
appeal to HM Courts & Tribunals Service to try and get my money. The DWP
made some objections going back upon their original statement and fortunately I
was able to overcome them all. The cost of a Social Security Appeal compared
with the £1310.14 (approx.) I am owed makes a mockery of prudent civil service
management. Please intervene on my behalf.
letter and 6 months later the DWP have refused to pay the arrears although I
have read a copy of the letter confirming the DLA should never have been
stopped the DWP have refused to pay it even after several mandatory
reconsideration notices and the latest DWP farce is that they say I have to
appeal to HM Courts & Tribunals Service to try and get my money. The DWP
made some objections going back upon their original statement and fortunately I
was able to overcome them all. The cost of a Social Security Appeal compared
with the £1310.14 (approx.) I am owed makes a mockery of prudent civil service
management. Please intervene on my behalf.
Since you wrote to me, I have had a PIP
assessment where my claim for PIP was refused therefore, I am appealing against
that DWP decision to but I would like to make a point which I believe needs
referring to the Minister in charge of the DWP that under the Disability
and Equality Acts a person suffering
from a mental illness have the same rights in the same way as a physically
disabled person therefore the new PIP is split into two criteria 1) Help with
care needs and 2) Mobility. 50% of my assessment was based purely upon my
mobility which is nothing to do with my mental illness and therefore the mentally
ill are suffering discrimination if 50% of the PIP is to do with mobility. A
representative of the DWP entirely agrees with me and said that the PIP is
‘flawed’. The mentally disabled people require separate provision not offered
by the PIP.
assessment where my claim for PIP was refused therefore, I am appealing against
that DWP decision to but I would like to make a point which I believe needs
referring to the Minister in charge of the DWP that under the Disability
and Equality Acts a person suffering
from a mental illness have the same rights in the same way as a physically
disabled person therefore the new PIP is split into two criteria 1) Help with
care needs and 2) Mobility. 50% of my assessment was based purely upon my
mobility which is nothing to do with my mental illness and therefore the mentally
ill are suffering discrimination if 50% of the PIP is to do with mobility. A
representative of the DWP entirely agrees with me and said that the PIP is
‘flawed’. The mentally disabled people require separate provision not offered
by the PIP.
However, as my disabled income comes to an
end on the 7th of January my friend Katy Perry has offered her brand
name katyperryfashn.co.uk for me to become a fashion designer and I am chief
trustee of the Katy Perry Charitable Trust UK on a voluntary basis. What grants,
investments, loans do the Government offer to someone in my start up position?
end on the 7th of January my friend Katy Perry has offered her brand
name katyperryfashn.co.uk for me to become a fashion designer and I am chief
trustee of the Katy Perry Charitable Trust UK on a voluntary basis. What grants,
investments, loans do the Government offer to someone in my start up position?
Warm regards,
John S Rumary Dip (Oxon)
YASSMINEKATYCAT it is discrimation I will contact MIND and RETHINK and BIPOLAR UK over this 'nonsense on stilts' by the UK Government and Ian Duncan-Smith #IDS
ReplyDelete